The Drawbacks of Biodiesel

I have always liked the idea of renewable fuels. If done right they can make a contribution to the overall energy policy for the US. Unfortunately, if done wrong they can cause problems. One of the renewable fuels is Biodiesel. The National Biodiesel Board website describes Biodiesel as America’s first Advanced Biofuel (Biodiesel, 2015). The website goes on to explain that “It is a renewable, clean-burning diesel replacement that is reducing U.S. dependence on imported diesel, creating green jobs and improving our environment. It is made from an increasingly diverse mix of resources including agricultural oils, recycled cooking oil and animal fats and meets the strict specifications of ASTM D6751 (Biodiesel Fuel, 2015).

ASTM D 6751 provides the following technical definition for Biodiesel – “Biodiesel, n – a fuel comprised of mono-alkyl esters of long chain fatty acids derived from vegetable oils or animal fats, designated B100, and meeting the requirements of ASTM D 6751” (Biodiesel Basics, 2015).

The Green the Future website lists the following Biodiesel pros and cons (Biodiesel Pros, 2015).

  • Pros
  • Positive Energy Balance
  • Cheap Feedstock
  • GHG Reduction
  • Biodegradable
  • Economic Benefits
  • Ready to Use
  • Home Heating
  • Third World Benefit
  • Cons
  • Gelling
  • Automotive Breakdowns
  • Poor Quality
  • Reduced Fuel Efficiency
  • More Expensive
  • Unavailable
  • Highly Combustible

The US derives a many great benefits from Biodiesel. However, the Cons take away from the benefits. Bjørn Lomborg wrote an article for the Telegraph that addresses the issues the EU is experiencing with Biodiesel (The Great, 2015). He stated that the EU Green Energy Program “costs billions of pounds annually and causes at least 30 million people to go hungry every year (The Great, 2015).”  It appears that what was labeled as a CO2 neutral program, but it may cause air pollution. Furthermore, using food products for biofuels reduces the amount available for people to consume. It is important to note that biofuels using waste products are preferred to using grown products.

The amount of biodiesel is governed in the US by goals established in the Renewable Fuel Standard. “Congress created the renewable fuel standard (RFS) program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and expand the nation’s renewable fuels sector while reducing reliance on imported oil.

The RFS program was authorized under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and expanded under the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007” (Renewable, 2015). Today the nation finds itself at a crossroads. “The EPA is preparing to finalize new targets” (War, 2015). This has become a controversial issue because the EPA is late in revealing the new targets. Many think the targets will be flat or reduced due to issues with availability. While others want the program scrapped altogether. Determining new targets for future years could create more food shortages as well as exacerbate other negative issues. This may be a time to keep the previous targets until the issues are worked out. This would give everyone time to look at using waste instead of crops.

Using biofuels has pros and cons. The program has had its issues, but can contribute to reducing pollution and provide options in the US energy policy. However, the negative issues with biofuels must be addressed. Leaving targets where they are for future years or even reducing them can provide time to resolve the negative issues.


Biodiesel – America’s first advanced biofuel! (n.d.). Retrieved from

Biodiesel Basics – (n.d.). Retrieved from

Biodiesel Pros and Cons. Retrieved from

Renewable Fuel Standard Program | US EPA. (n.d.). Retrieved from

The great biofuels scandal – Telegraph. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Wars over EPA Renewable Fuel Standard heat up | WOPULAR. (n.d.). Retrieved from

About Fred Fanning Author

Fred Fanning currently writes biweekly on his blog His published works include the peer-reviewed book Basic Safety Administration-A Handbook for the New Safety Specialist. Fred also authored two editions of the peer-reviewed chapter Safety Training and Documentation Principles that was published in the bestselling Safety Professional Handbook and the Safety Professional Handbook Management Applications. He coauthored the peer-reviewed chapter Safety Training with Christine Fiori, Ph.D., PE, published in the bestselling Construction Safety Management and Engineering, second edition edited by Darryl C. Hill, Ph.D., CSP. Fred also has several self-published books. He has a series called Fred’s Safety Shorts. This is a collection of twelve books on topics related to safety published with Kindle Direct Publishing. Fred self-published another six books using both CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform and Kindle Direct Publishing. He has authored fifty-eight articles in various publications on the topics of safety and health and project management. Fred has earned several writing awards for his non-fiction work. Fred has two novels A Walk Among the Dead and Mystery at Devil’s Elbow.
This entry was posted in Hazard Control and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s